log gaussian curve fitting graphpad prism Search Results


unpaired t test assuming gaussian distribution with the graphpad prism version 9 program  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc unpaired t test assuming gaussian distribution with the graphpad prism version 9 program
Unpaired T Test Assuming Gaussian Distribution With The Graphpad Prism Version 9 Program, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/unpaired t test assuming gaussian distribution with the graphpad prism version 9 program/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
unpaired t test assuming gaussian distribution with the graphpad prism version 9 program - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
prism version 6.00 windows  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc prism version 6.00 windows
Prism Version 6.00 Windows, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/prism version 6.00 windows/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
prism version 6.00 windows - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian random numbers  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc gaussian random numbers
Gaussian Random Numbers, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian random numbers/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian random numbers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cumulative gaussian functions  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc cumulative gaussian functions
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Cumulative Gaussian Functions, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cumulative gaussian functions/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cumulative gaussian functions - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian distribution  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc gaussian distribution
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Gaussian Distribution, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian distribution/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian distribution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gaussian distribution fit  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc gaussian distribution fit
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Gaussian Distribution Fit, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gaussian distribution fit/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gaussian distribution fit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
graphpad prism 6  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc graphpad prism 6
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Graphpad Prism 6, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/graphpad prism 6/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
graphpad prism 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
prismtm graphpad software  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc prismtm graphpad software
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Prismtm Graphpad Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/prismtm graphpad software/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
prismtm graphpad software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
nonlinear regression using a gaussian distribution prism 7.00  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc nonlinear regression using a gaussian distribution prism 7.00
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Nonlinear Regression Using A Gaussian Distribution Prism 7.00, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nonlinear regression using a gaussian distribution prism 7.00/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nonlinear regression using a gaussian distribution prism 7.00 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
unpaired t-tests  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc unpaired t-tests
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Unpaired T Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/unpaired t-tests/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
unpaired t-tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (R) Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pearson's correlation coefficient (r) test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
double gaussian mixed model  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc double gaussian mixed model
Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting <t>cumulative</t> <t>Gaussian</t> function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.
Double Gaussian Mixed Model, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double gaussian mixed model/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double gaussian mixed model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting cumulative Gaussian function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.

Journal: Attention, perception & psychophysics

Article Title: The Attentional Repulsion Effect and Relative Size Judgments

doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1612-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Plots showing the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was (a) wider or (b) taller than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison variants tested as function of which side the comparison was on (left/right) and the side that the pre-cue was tested on. Curves show the best fitting cumulative Gaussian function for the group means. Error bars show ±1 S.E.M.

Article Snippet: Cumulative Gaussian functions were then fit to the data (GraphPad Prism; GraphPad Software, Inc) to determine the PSE.

Techniques: Comparison

(a) Plots show the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was farther from fixation than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison offsets tested as a function of which side the comparison rectangle was on (left/right) and the location of the cue (foveal/center/peripheral). Curves show the best fitting cumulative Gaussian function for the group means. (b) Bar graph showing the mean PSE for the comparison rectangle as a function of cue location and the relative side of the comparison rectangle. The average PSE collapsed across comparison side is also shown. The solid horizontal line show the expected PSE if no distortion were present given that the standard rectangle was always offset from fixation by 5.0°. All error bars show ±1 S.E.M.

Journal: Attention, perception & psychophysics

Article Title: The Attentional Repulsion Effect and Relative Size Judgments

doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1612-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Plots show the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was farther from fixation than the standard rectangle for the seven comparison offsets tested as a function of which side the comparison rectangle was on (left/right) and the location of the cue (foveal/center/peripheral). Curves show the best fitting cumulative Gaussian function for the group means. (b) Bar graph showing the mean PSE for the comparison rectangle as a function of cue location and the relative side of the comparison rectangle. The average PSE collapsed across comparison side is also shown. The solid horizontal line show the expected PSE if no distortion were present given that the standard rectangle was always offset from fixation by 5.0°. All error bars show ±1 S.E.M.

Article Snippet: Cumulative Gaussian functions were then fit to the data (GraphPad Prism; GraphPad Software, Inc) to determine the PSE.

Techniques: Comparison

(a) Plot shows the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was wider than the standard rectangle at the seven comparison widths. Width means were tested as a function of which side the comparison rectangle was located (left/right) and the trial stimulus array offset position (foveal/peripheral). Curves show the best fitting cumulative Gaussian function for the group means. (b) Bar graph showing the mean PSE for the comparison rectangle width as a function of comparison rectangle location and the stimulus array offset position (i.e., position of the standard rectangle at fixation or periphery). The solid horizontal line show the expected PSE if no distortion were present given that the standard rectangle always had a width of 3.0°. All error bars show ± 1 S.E.M.

Journal: Attention, perception & psychophysics

Article Title: The Attentional Repulsion Effect and Relative Size Judgments

doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1612-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Plot shows the mean proportion of time participants responded that the comparison rectangle was wider than the standard rectangle at the seven comparison widths. Width means were tested as a function of which side the comparison rectangle was located (left/right) and the trial stimulus array offset position (foveal/peripheral). Curves show the best fitting cumulative Gaussian function for the group means. (b) Bar graph showing the mean PSE for the comparison rectangle width as a function of comparison rectangle location and the stimulus array offset position (i.e., position of the standard rectangle at fixation or periphery). The solid horizontal line show the expected PSE if no distortion were present given that the standard rectangle always had a width of 3.0°. All error bars show ± 1 S.E.M.

Article Snippet: Cumulative Gaussian functions were then fit to the data (GraphPad Prism; GraphPad Software, Inc) to determine the PSE.

Techniques: Comparison